TopBand: ARRL uncommitted

[km1h@juno.com]

Well Dave, I have to agree with you.
Maybe our fearless Administrator can become a focal point for
distributing ALL input to ALL the Directors.  After all politicians only
perform when forced to. 

What say Bill, are you up to it??

73...Carl   KM1H


On Tue, 20 May 97 10:02:54 CST "David Schmocker"
<david.schmocker@twcable.com> writes:
>     On 20 March I e-mailed my ARRL director and vice-directors urging 
>them 
>     to support action on the CW-only subband for 160m.  I followed up 
>
>     thrice and received no response.
>     
>     On 8 May, I received from K1ZZ, a letter saying:
>     
>     "Ed Metzger (my director) has asked me to thank you for your 
>e-mail of 
>     March 20 concerning 160 meters.
>     
>     The Membership Services Committee is aware of the controversy and 
>is 
>     considering whether any action should be recommended to the 
>board."
>     
>     
>     In other words, *no* action will be taken unless we motivate such 
>
>     action!  Let's get those cards, letters, phone calls, nagging, 
>etc. 
>     going to your ARRL representatives  *NOW!*
>     
>     Frustrated,
>     
>     
>     David J. Schmocker KJ9I      David.Schmocker@TWCable.Com
>
>
>
>--
>FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/topband.html
>Submissions:              topband@contesting.com
>Administrative requests:  topband-REQUEST@contesting.com
>Problems:                 owner-topband@contesting.com
>

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/topband.html
Submissions:              topband@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  topband-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-topband@contesting.com