[TowerTalk] Tall verticals
DavidC
DavidC" <eDoc@netzero.net
Fri, 7 Apr 2000 22:52:56 -0400
You specified "tall" towers. What about a 65 foot Rohn 45
tower with tri-banders at 45 and 70 feet? Would the side-
mounted beam problem be as pronounced on that?
I want to load it for 80m and want to make some choices
about the type of base I use, where and how I side-mount
antennas and anything else that may impact performance on
80m. I have the tower but the pouring of the base has yet
to be scheduled.
- Thanks! & 73, DavidC K1YP in Hudson, FL
************************************************************************
>
> I recommend against shunt feeding tall towers
> with side mounted antennas.
>
> I had a 130 ft R35 tower with a 3L15 on top and 3L20
> side mounted at 63 ft along with an 80M inverted vee
> at 110 ft. It worked on 160 but was noticably less
> competitive after I added the side mounted 3L20.
> I believe it altered the current flow in the tower and
> suspect there was a phase reversal in the upper
> half, partially cancelling the vertically polarized
> radiation
>
> de Tom N4KG
_____________________________________________
NetZero - Defenders of the Free World
Click here for FREE Internet Access and Email
http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm