[TowerTalk] Tall verticals

DavidC DavidC" <eDoc@netzero.net
Fri, 7 Apr 2000 22:52:56 -0400


You specified "tall" towers.  What about a 65 foot Rohn 45
tower with tri-banders at 45 and 70 feet?  Would the side-
mounted beam problem be as pronounced on that?

I want to load it for 80m and want to make some choices
about the type of base I use, where and how I side-mount 
antennas and anything else that may impact performance on 
80m.  I have the tower but the pouring of the base has yet
to be scheduled.

- Thanks! & 73, DavidC  K1YP in Hudson, FL

************************************************************************

> 
> I recommend  against  shunt feeding tall towers
> with side mounted antennas.
> 
> I had a 130 ft R35 tower with a 3L15 on top and 3L20 
> side mounted at 63 ft along with an 80M inverted vee
> at 110 ft.  It worked on 160 but was noticably less
> competitive after I added the side mounted 3L20.
> I believe it altered the current flow in the tower and
> suspect there was a phase reversal in the upper 
> half, partially cancelling the vertically polarized 
> radiation
> 
> de  Tom  N4KG


_____________________________________________
NetZero - Defenders of the Free World
Click here for FREE Internet Access and Email
http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm