[TowerTalk] Q Street Articles .. ??
WA3GIN @ Arlington County, VA
wa3gin at erols.com
Wed Aug 23 12:26:04 EDT 2006
It is funny how the same discussions just keep repeating over the
years. The last I heard the MAXCOM was a clever, not very efficient all
band antenna that was easy to install and with enough power would
provide adequate communications for most instances. The marketing
claims seem to always exceed actual results and what is "new" about that
scenario? We live in a buyer beware world!
p.s. Next Year PALSTAR is coming out with a legal limit balanced wire
auto-tune unit that mounts on the tower. Powered via coax (60 volts).
Two rotor inductors and a vacuum variable. Just feed it 100 watts and
it will do the rest, haha. I think the government will move in that
direction over time and we won't have to be concerned about the less
efficient antenna implementations being sold to the government...
Michael Tope wrote:
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Julio Peralta" <jperalta at tampabay.rr.com>
>To: "'Mark'" <aa6dx at arrl.net>
>Cc: <towertalk at contesting.com>
>Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 5:05 AM
>Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Q Street Articles .. ??
>Funny thing about the Maxcom I think they are still being made and sold
>to the government.
More information about the TowerTalk