[TowerTalk] stacking monobanders
David Gilbert
xdavid at cis-broadband.com
Tue Nov 28 17:33:46 EST 2006
Doug,
Anecdotal results from anywhere are irrelevant ... that was my point. I
don't trust software analyses implicitly, but I trust them more than
opinions that aren't backed by direct comparison of some sort (like an A
vs B test of two antennas at the same height at the same time).
Yup ... well, close anyway. I used a fixed 2 element 40m wire yagi at
70 feet for a while. It worked great and I had a lot of fun with it.
It would have worked even better at 90 feet, and it would have worked a
whole lot worse at 45 feet like the original message from NY6DX discussed.
Dave AB7E
Doug Renwick wrote:
> Dave,
>
> Have you ever operated 40m from the northern latitudes?
> Anecdotal results from a QTH in Arizona are irrelevant.
> Have you ever used a 2L 40m beam at 60 feet?
>
> Doug/VA5DX
>
>
>
> I disagree with your disagreement ... hi.
>
> Per my earlier message, there is 2db difference for a 2 element 40m yagi
>
> at 60 feet versus 45 feet. That's about the same as the difference
> between a 2 element and a 3 element yagi. What I didn't mention before
> is that having a yagi too low also degrades the azimuth pattern and
> loses a lot of QRM rejection.
>
> No offense meant, but anecdotal results don't help in making good
> antenna decisions. I've worked Bouvet with a short 40m vertical and 100
>
> watts, and I've worked FR5 on 20m with 5 watts to a low vertical loop.
> Neither would be my preference for antennas. A QTH in VE5 might make my
>
> wishlist for generating a pileup during a contest, though ;)
>
> 73,
> Dave AB7E
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
--
save the cheerleader ... save the world
More information about the TowerTalk
mailing list