[UK-CONTEST] ROPOCO II - G0CKP

[Steve Knell]

This question wasn't about ROPOCO specifically.

What's the rulemaker's position on "sanitising" logs?

I guess it's ok to correct any obviously dodgy zones in CQ WW after the
contest(?).

But what if you think a call may be wrong/unique and you have the ability to
replay a qso with a single click of the mouse and you find you've made an
error.

Is it ok to "correct" this too?

Steve G0CKP

----- Original Message -----
From: Clive Whelan <clive at gw3njw.fsworld.co.uk>
To: <uk-contest at contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, August 05, 2002 1:37 AM
Subject: Re: [UK-CONTEST] ROPOCO II - G0CKP


> Steve Knell wrote:
> > I dunno how the adjudication works for this contest.  If I send you
TN159EH
> > (in error), then playback the tape and correct my log to TN159ES then
surely
> > the adjudicator would penalise you not me?
> >
> > If this was my only error, I would then have a perfect log.
> >
> > Any post contest change would create a discrepancy, but it all depends
whose
> > score gets hit.
> >
>
>
> The above is technically correct, but if you are really keen to win,
there's a
> better way still. You send everyone 599, and the alter the log so some are
> 589, some 579 etc, nut none 599. That way every single station you work
loses
> ten points.
>
> See my tongue in my cheek? I'm not suer if I saw yours, tell me it was?
>
>
> 73
>
>
> Clive
> GW3NJW
> gw3njw at gw7x.org
> Contest Cambria-http://www.gw7x.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> UK-Contest mailing list
> UK-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest