[UK-CONTEST] Club Calls Results

Wed Jan 31 19:20:34 EST 2007

I've a new found admiration for naivety.

73

Clive
GW3NJW

-----Original Message-----
From: uk-contest-bounces at contesting.com
[mailto:uk-contest-bounces at contesting.com]On Behalf Of G3SJJ
Sent: 31 January 2007 23:59
Cc: UK Contesting
Subject: Re: [UK-CONTEST] Club Calls Results

I haven't the intelligence to understand all of this Pete,
but one thing
I am certain of, you appear to display some naivety in the
contest world.

Rules can only go so far and cannot cover all eventualities.
Contesters
that succeed not only have skills in operating, but also in
interpreting
the rules.

It took me a few years to understand, but put simply, if it
doesn't say
you can't, then you CAN.

There is also the "British effect" which shows up quite
often. That of
self-imposed rules.

Perhaps the best example I can recall is a telephone call I
received
during my time as chair of HFCC after one of the IOTA
contests. The
caller wished to complain about a GM group who had a big
score and
apparently was operating from a hotel with mains
electricity. The
complainant had self-imposed the NFD rules into his
thinking. I have
found over the years this a typical British approach. Let's
try and make
it as difficult as we can for ourselves.

I recall our own "fracas" when you strongly disagreed with
SO2V
technique. I think your argument was that by holding a Run
frequency and
finding new stations on the 2nd VFO I was breaking some
unwritten rule.
Again, very much self-imposed on your own thinking.

Another example, before Don XTT changed the IOTA rules. At
GU8D we had
occasionally discussed one station on Sark and one on
mainland Guernsey,
both EU114. Perfectly reasonable because it didn't say it
wasn't allowed
in the rules. We actually didn't do it, mainly because we
self-imposed
the rules. Our Adriatic competitors we not so gullible, we
suspect.
Guess who beat us?

Chris G3SJJ

Peter Hobbs wrote:
> Hi Berni,
>
> A long day at the office!  But belatedly - take your
example where (let's
> say) an un-named club has fielded 3 club stations in the
past.  As far as I
> know they just had to apply and pay the licence fee for
these to be issued.
> The temptation is then to activate them in such a way that
it's quite
> difficult for contest entrants further away to work them.
Result - a bonus
> of 450 points for the home team, with minimal effort or
operating expertise
> being required.
>
> How do I define a scam?  In contest terms, by taking
advantage of omissions
> in the rules to gain advantage in a way that was not
foreseen by the contest
> organisers.  I wouldn't want to dissuade members from
turning out to support
> their club in Club Calls; it's just that if they are given
club station
> calls to activate there's an immediate 6 for 1 advantage,
just by paying a
> fee.  I'm not sure of the current legislation governing
the operation of
> club stations, but it wouldn't surprise me if a club
station can choose
> which particular call it uses from time to time, if it has
a range
> available.  This could make life even easier for a
potential scammer.  Even
> if forbidden by the RSGB general contest rules, it doesn't
need to actually
> enter itself.  To me that's a prima facia case of a rule
omission leading to
> a situation that was not anticipated and certainly not
intended.  Tactics if
> you like, but to me it's a plain old scam, not a lot
different from the
> beach towels that we all know and love to hate.
>
> Of course I'd love to meet you and the guys to discuss it
all over a jar,
> but where is the club?
>
> 73, Peter G3LET
>
>
> From: "Berni G0IDA" <g0ida at yahoo.com>
>
>
>> Pete,
>>
>>  I don't see it as a scam but as looking at the rules and
applying tactics
>> if that is indeed what clubs do. Since there is clearly
no limit for Club
>> Stations in the rules then every club is open to put on
as many or as few
>> CS as they see fit in my humble opinion.
>>  I also wouldn't see a problem if the rules were changed
to say that only
>> one CS can be used.
>>
>>  Can I ask you why you think it is a scam?
>>
>>  All the best,
>>
>>  Berni
>>  G0IDA
>>
>>  PS We can discus at the club next Wednesday, would be
nice to meet you.
>>
>>
>> Peter Hobbs <peter at tilgate.co.uk> wrote:
>>  Hi Berni,
>>
>> Do I gather then that you're quite happy with the
hypothetical scam that I
>> anticipated?
>>
>> 73 Peter G3LET
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Berni G0IDA"
>> To:
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 8:31 PM
>> Subject: Re: [UK-CONTEST] Club Calls Results
>>
>>
>>
>>> Pete,
>>>
>>> You'll notice that there is no problem in having more
than one Club
>>> Station for this contest as Northampton have been doing
this for at least
>>> the last 3 years and I'm sure the adjudicators have
noticed them.
>>> Whether you go QRP with those stations is purely a
tactical thing, I
>>> would say, as some clubs are out there to win and others
just to have a
>>> spot of fun and training.
>>>
>>> 73's
>>>
>>> Berni
>>> G0IDA
>>>
>>> Peter Hobbs
>>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks to Mike for the very early results for this
event, especially
>>> considering the extra manual work obviously required to
handle the
>>> reported discrepancies in club names.
>>> I had imagined that each participating club would field
*one* club
>>> station
>>> but looking at the rules, more than one does not appear
to be disallowed,
>>> providing that all such stations use calls specifically
issued to the
>>> club. I do wonder however whether multiple club station
entries were
>>> envisaged by the organisers and whether consideration
should be given to
>>> clarifying this point in the rules. One could imagine a
hypothetical
>>> situation arising where a club fields a number of QRP
club stations in
>>> their area that are only capable of working local
stations, including of
>>> course their club members . . .
>>>
>>> 73 Peter G3LET
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> UK-Contest mailing list
>>> UK-Contest at contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------
>>> Need a quick answer? Get one in minutes from people who
know. Ask your
>>> question on Yahoo! Answers.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> UK-Contest mailing list
>>> UK-Contest at contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>> Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.14/658 -
Release Date:
>>> 29/01/2007 14:49
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------
>> Looking for earth-friendly autos?
>> Browse Top Cars by "Green Rating" at Yahoo! Autos' Green
Center.
>> _______________________________________________
>> UK-Contest mailing list
>> UK-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.18/662 -
Release Date:
>> 31/01/2007 15:16
>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> UK-Contest mailing list
> UK-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest
>
>
_______________________________________________
UK-Contest mailing list
UK-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest