[UK-CONTEST] Deliberately Corrupting call signs
Kerr, Prof. K.M.
k.kerr at abdn.ac.uk
Tue Apr 6 14:42:16 PDT 2010
From: uk-contest-bounces at contesting.com [uk-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Alan Ibbetson [alan at g3xaq.net]
Sent: 06 April 2010 21:07
To: uk-contest at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [UK-CONTEST] Deliberately Corrupting call signs
Dave Sergeant wrote:
> Sending partial callsigns is often used by some in
> pileups though it is questionable whether it achieves anything. It may
> be useful in the gigantic pileups we encounter on dxpeditions
No it isn't. Not ever. Give your full call once, on the correct
frequency once the DX's receiver has opened at the end of their previous
QSO, and then listen to see to whom the DX replies. If it's not you,
wait for the QSO to complete and take the opportunity to get on the
correct frequency (which may change every QSO). Repeat until you get
through. Every competent DXpedition operator I have talked to says this.
The only exception might be where everyone has marginal propagation to
the DX (eg on 160), when you still give your full call but perhaps twice.
Sending partials just means an extra transmission, and drives the DX
operator barmy as he Alt-W's the partial he just typed into the log.
Alan G3XAQ (9G5XA et al)
alan at g3xaq.net
UK-Contest mailing list
UK-Contest at contesting.com
The University of Aberdeen is a charity registered in Scotland, No SC013683.
More information about the UK-Contest