[UK-CONTEST] [CDXC] DL QSLing

[Gordon Brown]

Well I was rather thinking about paper QSL's.  I download all my logs to eQSL and it is then up to the recipient to do whatever they want.  I have never heard of globalqsl but I will have a look at it.
How much effort is involved in signing a card?
73 Gordon G3MZV

 



________________________________
From: "David Ferrington, M0XDF" <M0XDF at Alphadene.co.uk>
To: Gordon Brown <gordonbrowns at btinternet.com>
Cc: UK-Contest at contesting.com
Sent: Saturday, 1 May, 2010 10:48:27
Subject: Re: [UK-CONTEST] [CDXC] DL QSLing

That's a bit unfortunate, so if one came from Global QSL (http://www.globalqsl.com/), you wouldn't reply to that either?

And I guess you don't use eQSL or LoTW?

Not trying to be confrontational, just understanding what some people will or won't do.

Quite a lot of people using MacLoggerDx have it produce the card for them.
Personally, it's not about not wanting to complete it by hand, but you haven't seen my handwriting!
Interesting point, do blind people have problems writing on a card, whereas they could have the computer type it?
-- 
73 de M0XDF

On 1 May 2010, at 10:27, Gordon Brown wrote:

> I will not reply to any QSL cards I get that have been produced by a computer.  
> If the sender has been bothered enough to complete the card by hand then I think he must want mine and I send him/her one completed in my own fair hand.
> 
> Gordon G3MZV