[UK-CONTEST] Unnecessary 80m CC rule tweaking?

Clive GM3POI gm3poi2 at btinternet.com
Thu Dec 29 15:36:59 PST 2011


No Neil, 
	You miss Andy's G4PIQ  and my point that  irrespective of who are
the better operators during the course of each contest. The Largest club
overall in terms of fielded entrants will surely win. Check out the Winner
and Second Clubs since the Contest began including of course your own club.
	In  limiting the score by  taking the highest four or five scores
from a club does not stop entrants within a club from trying to improve,
indeed they can try to lead (if in the second group) this group.
	My suggestion was that the leading adjudicated top four or five
scores count for the club. That way even the smallest of clubs have a shout.

73 Clive GM3POI

-----Original Message-----
From: uk-contest-bounces at contesting.com
[mailto:uk-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Neil Ackerley
Sent: 29 December 2011 22:15
To: uk-contest at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [UK-CONTEST] Unnecessary 80m CC rule tweaking?

There is one aspect being overlooked by limiting the number of members from
a club; with the unlimited number of members even the very lowly scores
count and encourage that member to better things. We in DMU ARS have a total
membership of 26 which is certainly not large and those members are far from
being all contest oriented. But several members started contesting very
modestly a couple of years ago and now are getting respectable scores. These
members would not have bothered to come on if their lowly scores did not
count.

The approach has increased the number of competent contesters in I am sure
many clubs.

These CC 80 contests are not CQWW or NFD

Neil, G3RIR



-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Day
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 8:59 PM
To: uk-contest at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [UK-CONTEST] Unnecessary 80m CC rule tweaking?

On 29/12/2011 12:35, Clive GM3POI wrote:
> Carrying on from that: How about limiting a club team size to say 5 or 
> 4 max based on highest scores but allow as many 5 member teams as 
> wanted by a club. However the overall score comes from not all those 
> teams but from the highest scoring  5.
> That way clubs do not have to invent ways of competing with other 
> large membership clubs, and the best win on the day without having to 
> field
> 15 active members.


You took the words out of my mouth Clive ... 5 in a team is a very good
idea!

Peter G3PHO
_______________________________________________
UK-Contest mailing list
UK-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest 

_______________________________________________
UK-Contest mailing list
UK-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest




=======
Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
(Email Guard: 9.0.0.888, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.18950)
http://www.pctools.com/ =======





=======
Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
(Email Guard: 9.0.0.888, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.18950)
http://www.pctools.com/
=======


More information about the UK-Contest mailing list