[UK-CONTEST] Normalising scores in the Tuesday night UK Activity contests
Malcolm Bryan
malcolm.bryan at googlemail.com
Fri Dec 30 04:16:16 PST 2011
David
I deliberately didnt mention the possibility of some stations deliberately
logging a different exchange to that sent. I would hope that the
adjudicators would spot it if one station were doing this repeatedly in a
contest and disqualify them!!
73
Malcolm
G8MCA / F1VNR
On 30 December 2011 11:56, David <g3yyd at btinternet.com> wrote:
> Malcolm
>
> It is called herd advantage. If everyone does this then everyone gains. I
> noted when the local club was taking part in VHFNFD this year that we
> (there
> are many of us who always send the 59(9)) convinced even the hardest
> proponent of giving "true" RS(T)that sending 59(9) was a benefit. It also
> cuts down on repeat requests, which is a decided advantage.
>
> Incidentally in the previous year 2010 VHFNFD we suspect that one entrant
> was probably sending 55 and deliberately recording 59 in some QSOs. So
> maybe
> you are a victim of such illicit gamesmanship?
>
> I work both HF and VHF contests.
>
> 73 David G3YYD
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: uk-contest-bounces at contesting.com
> [mailto:uk-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Malcolm Bryan
> Sent: 30 December 2011 11:44
> To: UK Contest List
> Subject: Re: [UK-CONTEST] Normalising scores in the Tuesday night UK
> Activity contests
>
> I had a bet some HF person would say that! You are completely missing the
> point that the person making the error doesnt get penalised. Also that the
> error can be with the report, the serial, the locator or callsign.
>
> 73
> Malcolm
> G8MCA / F1VNR
>
> On 30 December 2011 11:27, David <g3yyd at btinternet.com> wrote:
>
> > Solution to this problem was sorted out years ago always send 59(9).
> > Simple.
> >
> > 73 David G3YYD
> >
> > Malcolm Bryan
> > G8MCA / F1VNR wrote:
> >
> > Other station sends me 55 023 io91xx. I log this but he logs 59 023
> io91xx.
> > I send him 57 012 jo01bk and log it correctly, he receives it correctly.
> > When the adjudication program is run I lose the points but he gets
> > them as I have been deemed to incorrectly copy his exchange. This is
> > not uncommon with some logging programs defaulting to 59.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > UK-Contest mailing list
> > UK-Contest at contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest
> >
> _______________________________________________
> UK-Contest mailing list
> UK-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest
>
> _______________________________________________
> UK-Contest mailing list
> UK-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest
>
More information about the UK-Contest
mailing list