[UK-CONTEST] cqwwwpx

[Steve GW4BLE]

Hmm... interesting, there's a very fine line here, obviously one would not condone such practices should they be part of the rules (written or otherwise), but we should not be seen to quell innovation.

"Seemed to be great fun at the time"


Steve
GW4BLE 


Sent from my iPhone

On 30 May 2011, at 12:22, Bob Henderson <bob at 5b4agn.net> wrote:

> I have no doubt they would claim both frequencies are in use.  Emotionally,
> I agree this is not right.   CQ have so far adopted a more literal/technical
> stance regarding one transmitted signal at any one time.  This is what all
> the discussion is about.  But ultimately CQ can apply/interpret the rules
> governing their contests any way they please.
> 
> Bob, 5B4AGN
> 
> On 30 May 2011 11:10, Kerr, Prof. K.M. <k.kerr at abdn.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
>> ......but I'll bet you they would 'claim' both frequencies if you sent a
>> QRL on either. Thus both frequencies were concurrently in use by them on the
>> same band.
>> It is stating the obvious but this cannot be right, regardless of category.
>> 
>> Keith GM4YXI / GM5X
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: uk-contest-bounces at contesting.com [mailto:
>> uk-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Bob Henderson
>> Sent: 30 May 2011 11:11
>> To: UK Contest Reflector
>> Subject: Re: [UK-CONTEST] cqwwwpx
>> 
>> On 30 May 2011 09:21, Gerry Lynch <me at gerrylynch.co.uk> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 28/05/2011 02:52, Charlie Morrison wrote:
>>>> I notice C4N operating run stations on both 14.001 and 14.053. is
>>>> this within the rules??
>>> 
>>> No, it isn't, unless they claim they were duelling CQs from the same
>>> station on the same band.
>>> 
>>> 
>> Gerry
>> 
>> CQ don't seem fussed about the physical number of transmitters used in any
>> category, their focus appears to be upon the number of signals radiated at
>> one time.  I too have listened to C4N and have failed to find a single
>> incidence of more than one signal on a band at one time.
>> 
>> I have no connection with the C4N group and have no knowledge of the
>> category they entered.  However, so far as I can see, their interleaved run
>> stations on a single band appear consistent with recent rule
>> interpretations/enforcements by CQ.
>> 
>> I understand discussions continue over whether this interpretation is the
>> appropriate one.  We'll have to see how things play out and whether rule
>> clarifications result but if/until then, this is the face of contesting at
>> the top of the tree.
>> 
>> Bob, 5B4AGN
>> _______________________________________________
>> UK-Contest mailing list
>> UK-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest
>> 
>> 
>> The University of Aberdeen is a charity registered in Scotland, No
>> SC013683.
>> _______________________________________________
>> UK-Contest mailing list
>> UK-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> UK-Contest mailing list
> UK-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest