[VHFcontesting] question about portable operator class
Jeff Embry (K3OQ)
jeffrey.embry at gmail.com
Sun Aug 20 12:42:06 EDT 2006
I would love to see a QRP category for home stations. This is the way I
operated the last two years. Having played rover for a couple of times,
I don't have the inclination nor desire to do the portable thing...but
am quite happy running QRP from home.
I doubt that it will ever happen...but would be nice to see.
Jeff Embry, K3OQ
No trees were harmed in the sending of this message, however a large
number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
Bob Witte K0NR wrote:
>>Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] question about portable operator class
>>To: vhfcontesting at contesting.com
>>Message-ID: <c17.1f2d206.3218cd5e at aol.com>
>>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
>>In a message dated 8/18/06 6:04:43 PM Central Daylight Time,
>>ku4bp at triad.rr.com writes:
>><< From reading the rules, looks like 10 watts PEP or
>> less, portable power source and portable antennas = portable operator class.
>>Unless you're out to win a plaque I'd run all the power you can. Go 100 watts
>>or better on 6 and 2. No sense suffering.
>It depends on your objective and personal preferences. I agree that
>having 100W (or more!) will get you more contacts and grids. On the
>other hand, I've had a really good time doing the QRP (I mean, Single
>Operator Portable) approach.
>Why would you want to do QRP?....there are several different answers:
> - just because (that old QRP "what can I do on low power?" challenge)
> - with the ARRL rules, it puts you in competition with other portable
>stations (only), not the big stations at home
> - simplifies the portable power issue (smaller battery, etc.)
> - you can go "backpack portable" and hike to a great spot
>Your mileage may vary. Personal preference applies. Just be sure to have
>Note that there is a VHFQRP list on yahoo groups:
>73, Bob K0NR
>VHFcontesting mailing list
>VHFcontesting at contesting.com
More information about the VHFcontesting