[VHFcontesting] Suggestion for the ARRL June VHF contest

[Bob, W3IDT]

Thanks Pete.
But...

My proposal alone will not accomplish much.
Write the CAC if you agree (write even if you disagree).

CAC mailing list:

http://www.arrl.org/files/file/CAC%20List/CAC%20June%202022(1).pdf

.......
. Robert F. Teitel, W3IDT
.
. w3idt at comcast.net
. w3idt at arrl.net
........

On 10/26/2022 9:11 PM, Pete K0BAK via VHFcontesting wrote:
>   Multiple modes per station is the best way to improve activity IMHO. Thanks for submitting this proposal; the details can be debated but the main thrust of allowing multiple modes is key. Sticking with VHF tradition doesn't make sense when traditional VHF contesting has been blown up by overuse of WSJT.
> -- Pete K0BAK, mediocre VHF rover
> 
>      On Wednesday, October 26, 2022 at 08:37:48 PM EDT, Bob, W3IDT <w3idt at comcast.net> wrote:
>   
>   I have a long standing proposal before the ARRL Contest Advisory
> Committee (CAC) for THREE contacts per station - CW, VOICE(ssb, am, fm),
> ANY DIGITAL -  on 6m and 2m, and TWO contacts per station - ANALOG,
> DIGITAL - on the higher bands.
> 
> The reasons for the distinction are explained in the proposal which is
> copied in full below.
> 
> The committee did change ENTRY Categories.
> 
> Changing the entry categories is fine, similar to CW, SSB, or MIXED
> categories in various other contests.
> 
> Combining the new entry categories and multiple contacts per station is,
> in my view, the future of VHF contesting.
> 
> [I did not address entry categories, nor Rover / Portable issues, as I
> wanted to concentrate on rule changes to increase ACTIVITY.]
> 
> My proposal alone will not accomplish much.
> Write the CAC if you agree (write even if you disagree).
> 
> Bob, w3idt
> 
> { rest of thread elided - PK }
>    
> _______________________________________________
> VHFcontesting mailing list
> VHFcontesting at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting