[WWYC] WWYC Age Limit: Poll Results

[Royce Hunt, M0RHI]

Well as everyone's busy nominating, I may as well say who I think too.
Of course Timo's obviously worthy of a honourary membership...
Dave, G4BUO has done a lot of work helping YCers in the UK, and his 
commitment to the EU Sprint Contest which is widely supported amongst 
WWYC, so I agree.
Paolo, I2UIY has done sterling work encouraging WWYCers to contest, and 
was very supportive at WWYC-Meeting.
Mario, S56A is also a very good patron of WWYC, and has helped many 
start contesting at a high level

So I agree with all the above, don't know any of the rest well enough to 
say :P
I agree with the automatic hall of fame for WWYCers that are now too 
old, like G0MTN (what a OF he is :) ) etc

I'll listen out for you Mikey at Christmas, if I can string some sort of 
antenna up
Royce, M0RHI

Simon Pearson wrote:

> Hi guys,
>
>> I have been a bit inactive lately but now I will follow up on this 
>> subject.
>
>
> Nice to see you QRV again Mike. Great that you've got your kit fixed, 
> nice job. I will be listening for ya over the Christmas holidays. 
> Listen out for M0CLW/P[issed], special call! ;-)
>
> Anyway, can we have OFs as honorary members, even if they haven't 
> actively done anything for WWYC (but they DO support young contesters)?
>
> Maybe what should happen is once you are too old to be a 'normal' 
> member of WWYC is you enter the "hall of fame". So in 11 years time, 
> when I'm 30 years old, I'll enter the "hall of fame". However, OFs who 
> help/support young contesters and/or WWYC are made "honorary members" 
> of WWYC. Personally I think that is more logical. Thoughts?
>
> There are a few guys I'd like to see added as "honorary members":
> * Al, 4L5A/D4B
> * Dave, G4BUO
> * Paolo, I2UIY
> * Ben, DL6RAI
>
> Hmm, there are others to go on the list but they just aren't coming to 
> me right now. My excuse is that it's Friday ;-)
>
> These are besides the obvious ones - Timo OH1NOA, Mario S56A, Zoli 
> HA1AG... These guys deservedly enter as honorary members.
>
> So folks, what do you all reckon?
>
> 73,
>