Rich Measures wrote:
>>Rich Measures wrote:
>>>
>>>It seems to me that we start with a parallel inductor /resistor
>>>suppressor circuit, the conductance (G) and susceptance (B) of which has
>>>an Admittance, Y. This admittance may be converted to an equivalent
>>>impedance, represesented as a series Xp-Rp.
>> ^^^^^^ ^ ^
>>
>>That's where it all goes wrong. What you have just described are Rs and
>>Xs, where s stands for SERIES-equivalent.
>
>What about a situation where it is understood by all parties except one
>that "Rs" stands for VHF parasitic suppressor resistor? .
Oh my... have you really believed for all this time that the "s" in "Rs"
stands for "suppressor"?
>In Wes'
>measurements, he uses the term "Ls". What is "Ls", Mr. White?
Copied and pasted directly from Wes's own page: "the measured effective
(series) inductance".
In other words, Ls is the effective inductance that produces the
effective series reactance Xs by the usual formula: Xs = 2*pi*f*Ls, or
Ls = Xs/(2*pi*f).
The analysis of Wes's tables that I posted ties together all of Wes's
own words with that industry-standard interpretation of the meanings of
Rs, Ls, Xs, Rp, Lp and Xp. The math was given in full detail and there
were no gaps and no unresolved questions.
73 from Ian G3SEK Editor, 'The VHF/UHF DX Book'
'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB)
http://www.ifwtech.demon.co.uk/g3sek
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|