To: | <amps@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [AMPS] parasitics |
From: | G3SEK@ifwtech.demon.co.uk (Ian White, G3SEK) |
Date: | Thu, 21 May 1998 20:03:47 +0100 |
Jon Ogden wrote: >So why don't we see more extensive damage in 3-500Z's with bent filaments >if arcing is the real cause? > >I've asked this question at least twice and no one has responded to it >yet. So I am asking it again. > How much damage should you expect? I don't know. Nobody has come up with a real explanation of how the forces necessary to bend a filament are generated, applying the same principles as an electric motor. The other question that's still unanswered is what was the state of the filament just before the event? Was it properly centered in the grid cage... or was it already bent, so that even a small movement would cause it to touch? The same question can be asked about burned-out resistors etc: what state were they in, just *before* the event? I don't think anybody really knows, because even the "amplifier doctors" and "post-mortem experts" don't start looking until *after* something has gone wrong. 73 from Ian G3SEK Editor, 'The VHF/UHF DX Book' 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB) http://www.ifwtech.demon.co.uk/g3sek -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [AMPS] Re: Parasitics, Ian White, G3SEK |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [AMPS] low out on 10m--clarification, Scott Townley |
Previous by Thread: | [AMPS] parasitics, Jon Ogden |
Next by Thread: | [AMPS] parasitics, km1h@juno.com |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |