| To: | <amps@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [AMPS] RF filament choke for indirectly heated cathodes? |
| From: | N6BUU@aol.com (N6BUU@aol.com) |
| Date: | Wed, 21 Jun 2000 16:50:49 EDT |
In a message dated 06/21/2000 01:23:09 PM Pacific Daylight Time, philk5pc@tyler.net writes: << Ameritron does it right, but alas, no anode parasitic suppressor! (((73))) Phil, K5PC >> IT SEEMS TO ME THAT MAKES EVEN LESS SENCE! HANK -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com |
| Previous by Date: | [AMPS] Tubes in Oil, Jeff Dixon |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [AMPS] RF filament choke for indirectly heated cathodes?, N6BUU@aol.com |
| Previous by Thread: | [AMPS] RF filament choke for indirectly heated cathodes?, measures |
| Next by Thread: | [AMPS] RF filament choke for indirectly heated cathodes?, Phil Clements |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |