Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [Amps] Amplifier that was for sale

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: RE: [Amps] Amplifier that was for sale
From: "Dave Meitzen" <dmeitzen@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 14:06:54 -0600
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
I thought the FCC passed a NPRM dealing with all of this. In effect they
made it a non-issue. The 10 meter amp issue is gone. The manufacturers can
manufacture amps that cover 10 meters and there were no restrictions on who
could buy them. I believe that has happened in the last 3-4 months?
FYI
Dave

-----Original Message-----
From: amps-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:amps-bounces@contesting.com]On
Behalf Of Will Matney
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 1:39 PM
To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] Amplifer that was for sale


Bill,

This is a good example of how tattle-telling on the amps being sold has
back-fired and is causing problems with amateur sales. I'm not for sure,
but I heard there's a few who monitor eBay and other auctions on a day
by day basis just to report these. I think I can spend my time doing
better things than that and do. Plus, as many that's sold on those
auctions, you can readily tell that the FCC just don't care about this
stuff anymore. If they did, they wouldn't be passing the law for 10
meter amps and kits. It's not like someone selling something that can
cause harm in a bad way, maybe some TVI or interference with the lower
portion of 10 meters. This is the FCC's problem and theirs alone. I
think too many folks gets their nose bent out of joint over the smallest
things anymore, and now it's coming back to bite them. That's just my
opinion on the subject, not anyones elses.

Will Matney

Bill Turner wrote:

>On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 01:03:29 -0600, Phil Clements wrote:
>
>
>
>>E-Bay, in recent years, has gone from "politically correct" to
>>paranoid!
>>
>>
>
>_________________________________________________________
>
>Can you blame them for being paranoid?  They're a big fat target with
>deep pockets.  I'm surprised the FCC hasn't nailed them already.
>
>It's a shame, but I see their point of view.
>
>--
>Bill W6WRT
>
>_______________________________________________
>Amps mailing list
>Amps@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
>
>__________ NOD32 1.880 (20040928) Information __________
>
>This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
>http://www.nod32.com
>
>
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>