Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Parasitics & Filament Sag

To: "'Mike Sawyer'" <w3slk@uplink.net>, <AMPS@CONTESTING.COM>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Parasitics & Filament Sag
From: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 15:15:07 -0400
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Mikey, 

>     Personal cheap shots do nothing to bolster your 
> arguement, Joe. As a matter of fact it demonstrates weakness.

That is nothing more that rich has been doing to other participants 
of the Amps list for years.  Frankly, his constant misrepresentation 
of Wes Stewart's work and work by others is far more "cheap." 

Ever wonder why staff from none of the amateur manufacturers will 
participate here?  Ever notice that people like Dick Erhorn, Dick 
Frey, Wes Stewart, Carl Huether, etc. no longer participate here?  
It's because they gave up after the constant abuse from Rich Measures, 
his refusal to listen to real engineering that failed to support 
his junk science and his constant misrepresentation of the truth.    

>     I used nichrome and they worked. It was the only 
> substitution made. The original suppressors were only in the 
> amp for a short time (two weeks in intermittant operation). So 
> it sounds to me that there is some merit to what Rich is saying.

If you used the full measures SB-220 kit, you made far more changes 
than simply substituting a resistance wire suppressor for the stock 
suppressor.  The changes make a significant difference in anode 
circuit resonances and the suppressors cannot be compared directly 
for effectiveness.  

73, 

   ... Joe, W4TV 
 

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>