---- Tom Osborne <w7why@verizon.net> wrote:
> DD wrote:
>
> >
> > That's the same way I look at SB-200's. It's a shriveled up dried out
> > fish...
>
>
> Hi Bob
> Has anyone modified the 200 with Russian triode(s) for six?Seems a much
> better alternative to using 572`s...73 all,K7RDX(On vacation in Ramstein
> Germany...Long way from home!)
> I guess it is all how you look at things.
>
> I have a SB-200 and like it very much. Gives me 500-600 watts out full
> bore. No problems tuning on any band. Dunno what else I could ask of an
> amp. Think I paid $275 for it. If the tubes go bad, I can replace them for
> $150 compared to $500 to $1000 a pop for big tubes.
>
> Guess an Alpha Super Duper 1001 would give me more power, autotune, but more
> power I don't need and takes me about 3 seconds to tune the amp. I like
> running around 500 watts-keeps the neighbors and the wifey happy. So, all I
> need is a SB-200 to keep me smiling!! To each his own I guess--that's the
> great thing about ham radio. 73
> Tom W7WHY
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|