Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] stability of amps

To: carlseye@verizon.net, amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] stability of amps
From: Gudguyham@aol.com
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 01:26:14 EDT
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
 
In a message dated 9/24/2007 5:50:38 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
carlseye@verizon.net writes:

If you  can make a 572B stable at 50 mhz, 
then why can't it be stabilized at 30  mhz.?????
carl /  kz5ca



OK, I will take a snare at this question.....If you built an SB-200 just  for 
10 meters with a nicely tuned tank circuit with a decent Q and a nicely  
tuned input circuit, you will probably have a stable amp.  When the amp is  
used 
on 10 meters with a tank coil that is NOT optimized, all sorts of things  can 
happen (and usually do)when you are working with a tube (572) that is a bit  
finiky.  The proof to this is that Carl (Km1H) and myself have pretty  stable 
Sb-200 conversions for 6 meters USING the single band theory.  
73 Lou



************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>