Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Dedicated RF

To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] Dedicated RF
From: W2XJ <w2xj@nyc.rr.com>
Reply-to: w2xj@w2xj.net
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 20:02:48 -0400
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
It is really no different than tube amps. In either case the amp must be 
designed to do the job. Many tube amps can not do RTTY or digital at 
legal limit. Those that can are not inexpensive. There is no difference 
in designing a key down CCS tube amp or a solid state amp. In either 
case there will be some over design as some will evaluate it.


On 7/29/12 7:54 PM, Jim W7RY wrote:
> We're talking about RTTY rag chewing and contesting. And SSTV.
>
> 73
> Jim W7RY
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bert Almemo
> Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2012 2:05 PM
> To: 'Carl' ; w2xj@w2xj.net ; amps@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [Amps] Dedicated RF
>
> CCS? Are we talking about broadcasting or hamradio? ;-)
>
> Bert, VE3NR
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: amps-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:amps-bounces@contesting.com] On
> Behalf Of Carl
> Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2012 4:50 PM
> To: w2xj@w2xj.net; amps@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [Amps] Dedicated RF
>
> And just what SS devices would you suggest that will run 1500W CCS and still
> give -40dB or better SSB IMD3 over 1.8-30MHz?
>
> Carl
> KM1H
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "W2XJ" <w2xj@nyc.rr.com>
> To: <amps@contesting.com>
> Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2012 2:29 PM
> Subject: Re: [Amps] Dedicated RF
>
>
>> For all that and what it will cost, Solid State is a better way to go.
>>
>>
>> On 7/29/12 2:25 PM, Dan Simmonds wrote:
>>> Gary K9GS wrote:
>>>> I agree with Rob....yet another 2x 3CX-800 amp.  Big deal.  What would
>>>> be the point of buying one of these
>>>> when I could buy an Alpha 87, TenTec, etc....
>>>>
>>>>
>>> 20 kV (working limit) / 28 kV (test limit) vacuum caps
>>> Custom-built edge-wound tank roller inductor (1/16" x 3/8" silver plated
>>> Beryllium)
>>> Toroidal HV transformer with 97% efficiency + or -
>>> Remote display head
>>> etc, etc
>>>
>>> Dan  KK3AN
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Amps mailing list
>>> Amps@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Amps mailing list
>> Amps@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>>
>>
>> -----
>> No virus found in this message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 10.0.1424 / Virus Database: 2437/5162 - Release Date: 07/29/12
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>