Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Rectifier equilization?

To: n7rt@cox.net, amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] Rectifier equilization?
From: TexasRF@aol.com
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 16:12:41 -0400 (EDT)
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Hardy, that is correct: no equalizer parts are needed for avalanche type  
diodes like the 1N5408.
 
Each diode reaches a maximum reverse voltage determined by the individual  
diode's. avalanche threshold voltage and the reverse current is limited by  
lowest reverse current device in the string. They don't even need to be  
matched.
 
Of course the sum of the diode reverse voltages has to be less than the  
peak transformer voltages to keep the reverse current below a catastrophic  
level. Your 12 diode string should be good for an 8 to 10KV power supply with  
plenty of safety factor.
 
Forward current ratings need to be adjusted downward with capacitor filters 
 as the peak charging current can be 5 to 10 times average current. Power 
loss  heat is related to current squared and the individual diodes need 
enough air  flow to dissipate the added heat.
 
73,
Gerald K5GW
 
 
 
 
In a message dated 9/13/2013 12:16:10 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  
n7rt@cox.net writes:

I have  just rejoined the amp list after a few years and am wondering if 
the diode  equalization question was ever resolved.
I am building a new bridge HV PS  and it uses 12 diodes per leg. Rich 
Measures says using a .01 & 470K  across each diode is no longer needed due to 
improvements in semiconductor  manf. processes.
I have 100 1N5408's that came off the same reel so I feel  they should be 
matched fairly close.
I would like to hear a few  opinions.
Thanks
73 Hardy  N7RT
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing  list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>