Amps
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [Amps] "Conventional" current flow

from [donroden] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] "Conventional" current flow
From: donroden@hiwaay.net
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 10:00:44 -0600
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com> 
Especially when politics are concerned..... Snoops is not neutral.
Don W4DNR


Quoting Ken Durand <N4zed@comcast.net>:


Snopes is not the final word.  Do your own research.  Snopes often leaves
out important details. The lie of omission is one..

Ken
N4zed


_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [Amps] "Conventional" current flow, Ken Durand
Next by Date:  Re: [Amps] "Conventional" current flow, Larry Dighera
Previous by Thread:  Re: [Amps] "Conventional" current flow, Ken Durand
Next by Thread:  Re: [Amps] "Conventional" current flow, Fuqua, Bill L
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]