| Subject: | [CQ-Contest] CQWW - are signal reports optional? | 
|---|---|
| From: | n2mg@eham.net (Mike Gilmer, N2MG) | 
| Date: | Mon Nov 25 20:12:26 2002 | 
EI5DI wrote: > >The "599" is a sort of synchronizing sound > > Yes, but I believe that's only because we all expect it. If you > don't expect it, you won't miss it. When I'm running and you call > me, I send your callsign - you hear it and you know the important > bit comes next. But when the callers adopt your method, *you* lose the sync bit. They send nothing but 599XX. Since I do a lot of running I like to hear the "599". Mike N2MG  | 
| Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] lousy contest calls, N2TK | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] MS-DOS end-of-life 31 December 2002, David Robbins | 
| Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] CQWW - are signal reports optional?, Paul O'Kane | 
| Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] CQWW - are signal reports optional?, K4RO Kirk Pickering | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |