On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, Mark Beckwith wrote:
>
> 1. Already mentioned in one of the 3830 posts - the practice of using
> leading zeros in SS #s should be discouraged. In all the "how to operate
> this contest even though you think you can't" articles, the authors would
> serve the contest well to add a sentence saying "Using leading zeroes (i.e.
> 'NR 001') is not required by the rules, and most SS operators don't bother
> with them. Just send '#1')"
>
I also see no need for leading zero's. I never sent them. As far as
people using them, maybe it's a matter of experience. If enough people
copy enough people not using them, it will catch on.
> 2. While we're at that, what could be said to discourage those awful "short
> integers" - where when a guy's number is #190, he sends "NR ANT" to "save
> time." Notice the "save time" is in quotes. Again, the article-writers
> could take the lead effectively here.
Maybe OK for CQWW but this is REALLY bad form in SS If the other guy's
signal is marginal, and I copy "98A", does that mean "98 A" or does it
mean "981" and I lost the precedence in the static? In every QSO I made
in SS, I assumed there were no cut numbers and logged the letters I
copied.
>
> 3. What on earth can we do to make "PREC?" easier for more people to
> understand? If I shot myself for every time somebody either sent the WRONG
> thing or his WHOLE exchange when I asked "PREC?" this weekend I'd be out of
> bullets by now. Here's an idea: if we think of it as part of the number, we
> could model the desired behavior (psychology again) and just ALWAYS tack it
> onto the number when asked for a fill on the number, i.e. when asked "NR?"
> we would reply "859B" instead of "859". If all respectable operators did
> this then everyone could get over the potential pitfall of "some do and some
> don't", and 10 years from now when you say "NR" to some ridiculously weak
> guy who thinks QRP is cool he'll say "45Q" so you don't have to ask him for
> his "PREC?" separately and risk his not understanding what you meant, even
> though you're S9+40 on his HW-7. Other ideas welcome, but maybe we should
> pick one and stick with it and get it publicized and model it to the people
> who don't know better.
>
A lot of people sent both NR/PR when I asked for NR repeats. I responded
to queries for precedence as "P?", "PR?", "PRE?" and "PREC?" I heard them
all. Interestingly, several people sent "P?" and I knew what they needed.
> So, we have the power to fix all these things. In the mean time, I have my
> own ways of sneaking the "PREC?" out of anybody who doesn't know what a PREC
> is, but that's a SS Secret.
One way I had was to repeat the number/precedence with a question mark.
If I copied "845 B" but wasn't sure about the "B", I'd send "845B?" and if
either part was wrong, he'd let me know. It's just as fast as sending
"PREC?".
>
> Great to be back in SS. Two radios has made it a completely different, and
> better, contest.
>
> Mark, N5OT
>
Welcome back, Mark! It's one of my favorite contests.
73, Zack W9SZ
GO SMC !!!
---------------------------------------------------------------
The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland!
THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS!
http://home1.pacific.net.sg/~jamesb/
---------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|