CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Response to K5ZD's Comments

To: <K1ZM@aol.com>, <CQ-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Response to K5ZD's Comments
From: <va3dx@sympatico.ca>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 20:34:01 -0500
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Absolutely Jeff, I agree , do not touch the present 48 hour AB category.
Just add a AB 24 category within the 48 hours.
Glenn VA3DX

Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Response to K5ZD's Comments


> Hi Glen
>
> I would support the notion of ADDITIONAL categories as long as the main,
> long-tenured 48 hour (no time limit) category remains viable for single-op
all
> band unassisted entrants - as, to me, that is the "grand-daddy" of them
all -
> kinda like the DECATHALON in the Olympics..  I think it would be a real
mistake
> to dilute that - even though I can see the day coming when I probably
won't be
> able to handle it myself - HI!  If the sponsoring organizations are
willing to
> ADD such classes for others who have less time to devote (or less energy),
> then that would seem to make sense to me.  I would line up behind it....
>
> So YES - your idea for additional categories would make sense to me.  Just
> pse do not amend what is the CLASSIC version of the contest - eg: no NEW
COKE -
> let's stick with the "CLASSIC COKE" for those who still can handle it!
(HI)
>
> JEFF
>


---------------------------------------------------------------
    The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland!
THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS!
       http://home1.pacific.net.sg/~jamesb/
---------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>