Re: [CQ-Contest] LotW - Needs More Participation

["Axel Schernikau, DL6KVA" <dl6kva@qsl.net>]

Hello Joe,

there's no way!

The DX-station has to send all documentation and get the certificate. 
After this the DX-station could send the keys for LoTW to the manager. 
Asked this in beta-testing-phase.

73 & gl

Axel Schernikau, DL6KVA
dl6kva@qsl.net

Joe Subich, K4IK schrieb:

>  
>
> > So for the time being I will continue sending updates of my log 
> > to my QSL manager who does not require my sending him photocopy 
> > of passport and license by snail mail.
> >    
>
> Does anyone know what standard/documentation ARRL/LotW requires of 
> a QSL manager in order to obtain a certificate for a station he/she 
> might manage?  
>
> For those DX stations with a traditional QSL manager, I don't see 
> why the manager couldn't upload logs in any case ... for others, 
> perhaps one way to deal with the requirement for documentation for 
> foreign amateurs is for US (and other) registered individuals to 
> serve as "on-line QLS managers."   
>
> The US station could use his/her certificate to sign the certificate 
> request for the DX station.  The DX station could send logs to the 
> "electronic QSL manager" (signed with PGP or some other unique ID), 
> the "on-line manager" could then convert the log to ADIF (if 
> necessary), sign the ADIF and upload it to LotW.  
>
> Although I do not have the time & resources to act as a traditional 
> QSL manager, I would certainly be willing to act as an on-line QSL 
> manager if such were possible.  
>
> 73, 
>
>   ... Joe, K4IK 
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
>  

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest