CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Here we go again

To: <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>, "i4jmy" <i4jmy.mauri@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Here we go again
From: "Mirko Sibilja" <s57ad@amis.net>
Reply-to: Mirko Sibilja <s57ad@amis.net>
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 02:33:56 +0200
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
----- Original Message -----
From: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
To: i4jmy <i4jmy.mauri@gmail.com>
Cc: KL7RA <kl7ra@ptialaska.net>; <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 5:03 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Here we go again


On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 14:25:09 +0100, i4jmy wrote:
>
> >This concept is wise and should have been adopted, but such an idea
> >implies mind flexibility and will to learn, as well as the real
> >understanding of the word "competition".
>
> _________________________________________________________
>
>
>...  There is at least one contest which already does this: The Mexican
RTTY contest, held the
> second weekend of February.  Perhaps other contest sponsors will take
> note?

The other one is SCC RTTY Championship, sponsored by Slovenia Contest Club,
with its Assisted (or, better to say, Expert or Unlimited) category, which
allows use of two radios,  packet spots and band changes are not limited to
ten per hour as in another SO categories.

Assisted category in SCC RTTY has been introduced (since 2004) due to
complains on limited band changes per hour which makes use of 2 radios
obsolete... OTOH, band changes were limited due noticed (and proven)
cheating (multi op operation in single op categories)...

Mirko, S57AD

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>