CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] WW SSB - the corruptive influence of packet

To: Bill Parry <BPARRY@RGV.RR.COM>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] WW SSB - the corruptive influence of packet
From: Alan Zack <k7acz@cox.net>
Reply-to: k7acz@cox.net
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 15:45:24 -0800
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I don't think PACKET causes people not to ID frequently.  It just seems 
to be some people's nature to say QRZ after a contact rather than give 
their call.  Nothing to do with PACKET.

Bill Parry wrote:

>Folks,
>
>I realize that packet causes lots of problems in contests but it is not the
>cause of all evil in contesting. There have been lots of stations that
>identify infrequently for years...certainly before packet was in common use.
>
>It is really easy to blame the things you don't like for the all the
>foolishness we hear in the contests. Outlawing packet tomorrow would not
>have the impact that many might hope. We have large numbers of stations that
>are not entering the contest but just hoping to work a few new countries.
>(We hope lots and lots of these stations.) They will continue to use packet
>and cause whatever negative consequences that result. 
>
>Considering the large numbers of Multi's, assisted stations and stations
>that don't enter the contests, the numbers of S/O stations improperly using
>packet is probably a pretty small percentage. This isn't to say that what
>they are doing is right. It is not. I just think that the number is pretty
>small considering all the "smoke and fire" that this topic has generated.
>
>Hopefully, any change in the contest rules will be well-considered. Changes
>can have both positive and negative consequences. I sure hope that we don't
>make the rules so "pristine" that it's no fun anymore. 
>
>Bill, W5VX
>
>
> 
>  
>
>>The really annoying thing I found this weekend were the stations
>>who were only identifying every 5 or 10 minutes because they
>>had a steady diet of packet assisted stations feeding their pileups
>>who knew their callsign a priori. As a single-op unassisted, it's a
>>royal PITA when you are trying to make the most of your operating
>>time to have to sit on a frequency for 5 or 10 minutes listening to a
>>huge pileup and wondering if you really need that station for a
>>multiplier because he won't identify.
>>
>>Packet can be fun if your just chasing DX, so I won't rain on
>>packet user's parade (sometimes I am a packet user), but I just
>>wish that the rare DX in the contests wouldn't assume that we
>>are all using it all the time. Send your call each QSO like
>>ZD8Z/N6TJ does.
>>
>>73 de Mike, W4EF.....................................................
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>CQ-Contest mailing list
>>CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>    
>>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
>  
>

-- 
Alan Zack
Amateur Radio Station K7ACZ
Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
Quality Engineer, The Boeing Company, Retired
Aviation Chief Warrant Officer, U.S. Coast Guard, Retired
U.S. Coast Guard, Always Ready, Always There
Every hour, Every day, Around the Clock and Around the World
SEMPER PARATUS 
http://gocoastguard.com

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>