CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R -- revised opinion?

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R -- revised opinion?
From: "Bob Naumann - W5OV" <w5ov@w5ov.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 13:53:12 -0600
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
N8VW wrote:

> Why is so2r somehow different?

Good question Pat.  I think the obvious answer is that we're talking 
about a single operator.  Some persist in not understanding this 
distinction.

Even so, I think this deserves some thought, and discussion.

Leveraging technology in a way for a single operator to operate as if 
he were a multi-op may cross the line.  Dueling CQ's may cross that 
line.  I'm not sure.

Bob Naumann - W5OV
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>