CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] 2006 SSB WPX

To: "'Kelly Taylor'" <ve4xt@mts.net>, <k1ttt@arrl.net>,"'cq-contest'" <CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] 2006 SSB WPX
From: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 14:10:01 -0600
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I thought that was one of the fun things about WPX was the plentiful mults.
Makes the WPX something other than a DX test from the western US.

Mike W0MU 

-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Kelly Taylor
Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 1:35 PM
To: k1ttt@arrl.net; 'cq-contest'
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] 2006 SSB WPX

Personally, I think the callsign borrowing thing is much ado about nothing.

To quote Charlie Sheen in Ferris Bueller's Day Off: "You could ditch."

If there's nothing stopping Ham A from doing it, there's nothing stopping
you from doing it either. Just like there's nothing stopping me from
applying for (and paying $60 for) a vanity, temporary use callsign such as
VC4C or XM4M. If I choose not to do that, I can't rightly then complain
about the person who does.

One thing I always liked about WPX is that the multipliers are almost
endless. Even WW has finite limits on mults. For every person who puts a
unique px on the air, that's one more mult for you to work. That, at least,
is positive.

73, kelly
ve4xt
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>