I disagree as well. It is like leaving some friends house without saying
hello, or
hanging just up after a phone conversation.
It is a part of the QSO as well as a matter of politeness.
Michael 4x4kf
Dale Martin wrote:
>
>
>
>>Rather than seeing this practice as rude, I take it as a
>>compliment when an experienced Sprinter does not send
>>"dit-dit" after I send my information. He is saying, in
>>effect, "I think you are a good enough operator to understand
>>that I have copied your exchange and don't need to
>>acknowledge. If I hadn't copied your exchange, I would have
>>asked for a fill."
>>
>>The absence of a response is the acknowledgement..
>>
>>
>>
>
>Oh, Hal. Here's where you and I disagree. I need that acknowledgement of
>his having received my exchange. The ack is as much a part of the QSO as
>the exchange. The absence of an ack does not a QSO make.
>
>73
>Dale, kg5u
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
>__________ NOD32 1.1759 (20060916) Information __________
>
>This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
>http://www.eset.com
>
>
>
>
>
--
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|