On Mon, 2006-09-18 at 00:04, Dale Martin wrote:
> Oh, Hal. Here's where you and I disagree. I need that acknowledgement of
> his having received my exchange. The ack is as much a part of the QSO as
> the exchange. The absence of an ack does not a QSO make.
The Sprint rules have incorporated both callsigns into the exchange -
you have to send the other guy's call even though you supposedly already
know it - and compliance is nearly 100%.
Maybe the Sprint rules should be modified to make acknowledgement a
mandatory part of the exchange?
--
Doug Smith W9WI
Pleasant View (Nashville), TN EM66
http://www.w9wi.com
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|