CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Natural Progression [was: CK and stuff]

To: CQ-Contest eMail Remailer <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Natural Progression [was: CK and stuff]
From: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 16:40:59 -0800 (PST)
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
----- Original Message ----
From: Robert Naumann <w5ov@w5ov.com>

In your buffer overrun example, you cite a sinister act.

How is that in any way like using a convenient fictitious check in SS or using 
a fictitious name in a contest exchange that requires a name?

I think you need to re-think this a bit.
---------------------------

No Bob.  If sending something other than what is "expected" breaks nothing, 
then it is not sinister.

In this case, run whatever check you want.  Send any name you want.  If it 
breaks nothing, and the sponsor agrees, then just have fun.

Ev, W2EV


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>