Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW defined "single op"

["Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>]

Hi Paul

I think you answered your own question with the first line.

Any sponser can make any rule they want.  Some even have contest's where use 
of telnet doesn't make one 'assisted'.  73
Tom W7WHY


> OK, so here's my beef. If that's so cut and dried, why does one >contest 
> sponsor declare that a single op using spotting networks >is assisted in 
> one  contest while, in another, calls the same thing a >"multi-op"? 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest