CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Selection Criteria

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Selection Criteria
From: "Yuri VE3DZ" <ve3dz@rigexpert.net>
Reply-to: Yuri VE3DZ <ve3dz@rigexpert.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 12:16:35 -0500
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Jeff, why don't you move to New England for a couple of major contests then?
:-))
Just kidding.
Only wanted to remind you that there are some other countries in the World
besides U.S.A.
For instance, there was only 1 spot for Canada in the last WRTC, and guys
from VE5/6/7 had to compete with VE1/VO1/VY2, which I believe makes a bit
more difference, than, for example between Indiana and Tennessee...
IMO, the selection should be made by comparing scores IN THE SAME area. I.E.
W4's have to compete against W4's, VE3's - against VE3's and so on.

73 Yuri  VE3DZ

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <ku8e@bellsouth.net>
To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 9:34 AM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Selection Criteria


> Jim,
>
> The problem is the most of the contests used for scoring are DX contests ,
which the New England
> area has a great advantage over everyone. I think the W4 area - at least
where I am is more equal to
> W5 than it is W1-W3. Even NM can't be that bad of a place. Look how well
N2IC does in DX contests.
>
> Jeff
>

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>