Also, one should read the rules of CQWW to understand how the score is
calculated.
There is no fancy mathematics.
It all is very simple, once one know the rules of the particular contest
(s)he has participated.
73,
Jukka OH6LI
-----Alkuperäinen viesti-----
...
>Study your UBN report, especially the scoring summary at the bottom and
all >will
>be made clear.
>
>73,
>Steve, N2IC
>Andrei Stchislenok wrote:
> Hello folks:
...
> Well, I have No problem with that, the (W2/NP3D) result is not that
great
> anyway; that difference (62,976 points) just looks weird...
>
> Same amount of Mults, more QSO's, and less points... But whatever;
this is
> not my point.
>
> My point is here:
> I opened my Writelog for the last year CQ WW CW and checked the
numbers of
> what I claimed with what I found in CQ Magazine.
>
> What I saw, I just did not get it...
>
> I worked 883 QSO's - got confirmed 857 - lost 26 Q's or 3%
> I worked 104 Zones - got confirmed 99 Zones - lost 5 Zones or 4.9%
> I worked 294 Countries - got confirmed 285 Countries - lost 9
Countries or
> 3%
>
> So: I lost 26 QSO's and 14 Mults. Or I lost 3% of QSO's and 3.9% of
Mults.
> OK
>
> My Claimed Score was: 874,160 points and Official result is: 743,808.
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
> That means: I lost 130,352 points or 14.9 percents!?
>
> For 3 percents of lost QSO's and 3.9 percents of lost Mults I lost
> 14.9percents of points?? How nice...
>
> Strange Mathematic, Guys... I dont get it, sorry...
>
> But whatever... The Judge is always right. (something like that I
heard)
>
> I never before even thought to analize all these numbers, feel just
sorry
> that I opened my eyes at this time...
>
> Really sorry for this long story...
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|