I sent cut numbers in the original exchange, but only
T for Zeros... I really don't like N for anything
other than a signal report.
If asked for a repeat, I sent full the full number.
Worked every time.
T was more of an issue on 20 with QSB it seemed to me,
and with newer ops.
Cuts won't go away and new contesters need to be aware
of the practice. If it takes an occasional repeat, not
much lost and more gained for the future.
Thanks for the Q Jeff... hope the K3 was fun!
73,
Julius
n2wn
--- Jeff Stai <jds@twistedoak.com> wrote:
>
> Good advice. They only confuse the new people and
> the casual operators. And we need them.
>
> thanks! - jeff wk6i
>
> AD5VJ Bob wrote:
> > I just went through many hours of ss not
> understanding why I was getting so many repeats.
> Since my logging applications lets me
> > decide whether to use all cut numbers or just the
> T for 0 I decided to change it from all cut numbers
> to using only the T.
> >
> > I have not had a repeat since.
> >
> > Not sure why but it seems no one is looking for
> cut numbers to be sent in place of real ones.
> >
> > So I suggest if your using cut numbers in your
> serial exchanges, you might want to consider not
> using them anymore.
>
>
>
> --
> Jeff Stai jds@twistedoak.com
> Twisted Oak Winery http://www.twistedoak.com/
> Winery Blog
> http://www.elbloggotorcido.com/
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|