CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] NEW CATEGORY? CQWW Challenge - SO1R

To: n3khk_john@verizon.net
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] NEW CATEGORY? CQWW Challenge - SO1R
From: DL8MBS <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 09:35:14 +0100
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
John Klim, N3KHK wrote

>4.     This is not a NANNY state, yet. 
>
The real sports seemingly don´t know this - or why are there 
"Nanny"-like weight-categories i.e. in boxing?

Would it be a compromise to add the relevant information (SOxR, 
op-hours, basic antenna-info) to internet-based score lists first before 
creating a wealth of new categories? Participation and facts may lead to 
catergories in the same way and for the same  reasons they were 
established in real sports - and even  in our competetive hobby. Or why 
should there be a separation between QRP/LP/HP with your  "Nanny"-argument?
Best 73, Chris

(www.dl8mbs.de)


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>