CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs

To: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs
From: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 18:07:04 -0800
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 05:26:26PM -0500, Ron Notarius W3WN wrote:
> A recent post said, in part:
> 
> < snip > Since IMO cheating is quite widespread < snip >
> 
> Who is cheating?
> When?
> How often?
> Exactly how are they cheating?
> And if "they" are cheating, why haven't they been exposed?
> 
> Let's deal in facts and figures, not innuendo, smears, denials, and other
> fear factors.

I think there is _plenty_ of evidence that some contesters are choosing to
cheat, and that these cheaters are being exposed:

http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/2008-12/msg00101.html
http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/2008-10/msg00278.html
http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/2008-07/msg00202.html
http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/2008-03/msg00101.html
etc., etc.

And let's not forget that even in the most recent WRTC, a competition with
intense scrutiny, there were "anomalies" in some logs that required an 
unusual adjudication to result in a fair determination of the finish 
order of that elite competition:

http://www.wrtc2006.com/release59.html

-- 
Kenneth E. Harker WM5R
kenharker@kenharker.com
http://www.kenharker.com/

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>