CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] TB-wires WPX category

To: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] TB-wires WPX category
From: Ryan Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2010 15:49:39 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I will take a stab at it -

Multiple feedlines can allow SO2R with gain and F/B, such as with the C31XR.

Ryan, N2RJ

On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net> wrote:
> Hello Randy,
>
> What is the rationale or thought behind the "one feedline" from a tribander
> (or quad) rule opposed to separate feedlines? I believe some manufacturers
> offer these choices as an option (Force12).
>
> The question about using a remote antenna switch at the top of a tower "got
> me thinking" about this.
>
> 73 de Bob - KØRc in MN
>
>
> - - - Original message - - -
>
> Based on the discussion I may need to add some more text to this
> explanation. For example, we have allowed receiving antennas in the past,
> but it does seem like a gray area that should be clarified for next year.
> Please let me know if you have any suggestions for how the rules can be made
> more clear or more interesting to competitors.
>
>
> Randy Thompson, K5ZD
> Director - CQ WPX Contest
>
> email: k5zd@cqwpx.com
> web: www.cqwpx.com
> facebook: www.facebook.com/cqwpx
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>



-- 
Ryan A. Jairam,
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>