There was a note on qrz.com (I think from one of the organizers) that said
they'd dropped the idea of using the WARC bands. It would probably be a good
idea to edit the main post on qrz.com to remove the reference to the WARC
bands, but I'm not sure if that's possible.
The rules on http://zerolandqsoparty.com no longer mention WARC at all.
73,
David, K2DBK
k2dbk.com
k2dbk.blogspot.com
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 12:48 PM, VE5ZX <ve5zx@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Joe,
>
> Apparently there is a gentleman's agreement according to this WIKI entry (
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WARC_bands ) which says "Due to their
> relatively small bandwidth of 100 kHz or less, there is a sort of
> gentlemen's agreement that the WARC bands may not be used for general
> contesting." Maybe some one can clarify this fact.
>
> In these rules which I think are official
> http://www.zerolandqsoparty.com/
> it says "160, 80, 40, 20, 15, and 10 meters only." WARC bands are not
> allowed.
>
> Yet in these rules in the QRZ forums
> http://forums.qrz.com/showthread.php?t=271653
> it says "Bands: 160, 80, 40, 20,15, and 10 plus QSOs on WARC bands & 50MHz
> by schedule. See Bonus section"
>
> Maybe some one can clarify which rules are the right ones. Hope there later
> posting is wrong It would be a shame to see contest intrusion on the WARC
> bands even for a single Q. It is not in the spirit of contesting and the
> use
> of WARC bands.
>
> Syl -VE5ZX
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|