CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC updated FAQ - Remote operation

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC updated FAQ - Remote operation
From: Mats Strandberg <sm6lrr@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 14:43:47 +0300
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Hello all,

It seems that the opinions of Paul EI5DI and the Russian DX Contest
Committee fully coincide...

The updated FAQ was a bit unclear, but when I now re-read the general rules,
it is quite clear that the RDXC Committee has the opinion that Remote
Transceiving is "unsportsmanlike and the entry is subject to
disqualification".

5.1.3 Using any IP net for the remote transceiving, including web
radiostations is unsportsmanlike and the entry is subject to
disqualification.

So if not before, at least now, we know the answer to my original FAQ
question...

Interesting difference in the approach of RDXC when comparing with other
leading organizers.

Also interesting to see that RDXC considers Remote Transceiving a worse
violation of the rules than for instance use of excessive power in any
category. There are two paragraphs in the rules that can result in
disqualification:

5.1.3 Using any IP net for the remote transceiving, including web
radiostations is unsportsmanlike and the entry is subject to
disqualification

**

5.1.6 The use by an entrant of telephones, telegrams, Internet, packet to
solicit contacts during the contest (self-spotting) is not allowed and
forces to disqualification of an entrant.

Nothing mentioned about violation of power limits or violation of national
regulations, that can result in disqualification of an entrant.


73 de R3/SM6LRR, Mats
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>