Tom, I'm quite aware of cq-contest's less than universal readership, but
still think that organizers of a major contest like RDXC would have
someone watching for controversies of the sort this has caused.
I have, indeed, written to the organizers - and will report whatever
they say.
73, Pete N4ZR
The World Contest Station Database, updated daily at www.conteststations.com
The Reverse Beacon Network at http://reversebeacon.net, blog at
reversebeacon.blogspot.com,
spots at telnet.reversebeacon.net, port 7000
On 3/2/2011 8:37 AM, Tom Frenaye wrote:
> At 07:37 AM 3/2/2011, N4ZR wrote:
>> This just about *has* to be a translation problem. I can sympathize
>> with the RDXC organizers taking every step to ban the use of remote
>> receivers (remote from the transmitter). However, the Russians have
>> always been at the cutting edge so far as contesting technology is
>> concerned, andI cannot imagine that they really intend to ban remote
>> operation where all radio transmitting and receiving is done at a single
>> site.
>>
>> Where are the organizers? Time to speak up.
> Pete -
>
> Don't assume cq-contest is the center of the universe. The RDXC guys, as
> those who run other contests, don't all spend a lot of time monitoring
> reflectors, even this one.
> Questions about contest rules should always be sent directly to contest
> sponsors. Their responses might be of enough interest to post here though!
>
> -- Tom
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> e-mail: frenaye@pcnet.com YCCC --> http://www.yccc.org/
> Tom Frenaye, K1KI, P O Box J, West Suffield CT 06093 Phone: 860-668-5444
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|