[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened
From: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 23:03:59 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
How about I ID using .000001mw of power?  You can't prove that I didn't ID.

Just make the calls a part of the exchange and it is done.

Mike W0MU

On 1/31/2014 9:05 PM, Michael Adams wrote:
Could it be that of the CQ contests, WPX might be viewed as a testing ground 
for new contest features?  After all, WPX had overlays, it was deemed fun, and 
now CQWW has overlays.

There's been an awful lot of griping in some quarters about stations that don't 
ID frequently enough.   Could it be that someone wants to see how this kind of 
rule might impact a contest?

Sure, we can debate the subject all we want on the reflectors; we probably 
wouldn't reach a consensus in the community.  The only way to find out whether 
a rule will make the contest better will be to try it out.

  If pileup management problems render the WPX less fun, then we argue for the 
rule to go away next year.

CQ-Contest mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>