CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened
From: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2014 07:53:06 -0600
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Morning Hank,

How about the other direction? ALA: Farnsworth? IE the letter speed is faster than the word speed. The letters are fast but spaced at a slower rate. makes fast code even easier to copy.

Joe WB9SBD
Sig
The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com
On 1/31/2014 9:00 PM, Hank Greeb wrote:
Or, at least sending "real code" instead of compressed spaces between elements of letters, shortening the duration of a "space" and other LIDdish tricks which makes it difficult to read at any speed.

I can copy 40+ wpm "real code" but quite often have trouble copying the LIDS who intentionally play tricks with International Morse Code.

72/73 de n8xx Hg
QRP >99.44% of the time

On 1/31/2014 21:48,"Yuri" <ve3dz@rigexpert.net> wrote:
------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 12:58:19 -0500
From: "Yuri"<ve3dz@rigexpert.net>
To:<cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened

Oh well...
Next step would be suggesting to slow down for those who can't copy CW well?

Yuri VE3DZ

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest



_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>