CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] 1980s checks in SS/SSB.

To: Robert.Chudek@gmail.com, cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] 1980s checks in SS/SSB.
From: Alan Dewey via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Reply-to: Alan Dewey <aldewey@aol.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 15:06:45 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I've said this before.  I don't user pre-fill data bases to prevent me from 
having to copy.  I use them 
to reduce the amount of TYPING I have to do.  I still think it is important 
that every exchange be copied 
every time.  It's just that, if it matches what is on your pre-fill, what type 
it again?  
 
Does contesting really need to be a test of how fast you can accurately type?
 
Lots of guys changed thier check in SS this year.  Nothing wrong with that in 
my opinion.  

73,

Al, K0AD
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Chudek <Robert.Chudek@gmail.com>
To: cq-contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Fri, Nov 21, 2014 1:50 pm
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] 1980s checks in SS/SSB.


My personal preference is not using any of these "crutches" for 
contesting. This puts me in the "active decoding" state while logging 
QSOs, where a mistake (bust) is fully attributable to my skill. It is 
too easy to fall into false sense of security of a "Check this and while 
you're at it, check that" database fever and not even pay attention to 
what the program puts into the RX field.

But that's just my style, I guess.  I love CW!

73 de Bob - KØRC in MN

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 11/21/2014 7:10 AM, Richard Ferch wrote:
> K0RC wrote:
>
>> Actually, it's a know fact that _some_ operators change their check 
>> to try and thwart the "appliance contesters" out there. :-)
>
> This is a classic example of cutting off your nose to spite your face. 
> The person who is hurt most by this is likely to be the person who 
> changes their check every year, because of increased requests for 
> repeats as compared with someone whose exchange is more predictable.
>
> 73,
> Rich VE3KI
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

 
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>