CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Unassisted, SK?

To: "Oliver Sweningsen" <w6nv@pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Unassisted, SK?
From: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2014 08:09:02 -0800 (PST)
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
WRTC qualification should not be about social engineering and "incentive for 
change".  It should be about "selecting the most skilled".


73, de Hans, K0HB/K7

On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 7:26 AM, Oliver Sweningsen <w6nv@pacbell.net>
wrote:

> Some have said that in the past, the 'best' operators 'wanted' to compete in
> the unassisted category.  
>  
> The WRTC qualification process will provide the incentive for change.  Two
> Bob Dylan quotes come to mind: "Yesterday's just a memory, tomorrow is never
> what it's supposed to be."  And, "You don't need a weatherman to know which
> way the wind blows."  
>  
> Check the scores and, follow the leader(s).  
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>