Count me amongst the pool that would not prefer to see an assisted class
in NAQP. Every contest does not have to look like the others and have
100 categories like the others. I prefer the "simplicity" of NAQP.
73 Rich NN3W
On 1/17/2016 2:02 PM, Steve London wrote:
On 01/17/2016 09:24 AM, Pete Smith N4ZR wrote:
The real question is how much better could it be doing?
Please define "better" ?
The activity level in both NAQP CW and NAQP SSB is already very high.
You never run out of folks to work in NAQP. Increase the level of
activity more, and the QRM level will just make it unpleasant for
everyone. I present CQWW SSB, 15, 20 and 40 meters as good examples of
"better" not necessarily being "better".
Pete, it's too bad that you didn't have a working radio over the past
two weekends to experience NAQP in its current form.
73,
Steve, N2IC
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|